Editorial independence
Affiliate commissions, advertisers, sponsors, manufacturers and prospective clients must not dictate conclusions or exclude material evidence.
Publishing Standards
GLP1Scientist Editorial Policy
How GLP1Scientist manages evidence, authorship, independence, uncertainty, commercial relationships and AI-assisted production.
Editorial standards
Accuracy, independence and accountability
Accuracy and substantiation
Material medical, regulatory, scientific, patent and commercial claims require appropriate support.
Source transparency
Pages identify whether information comes from regulators, labels, studies, registries, manufacturers, filings, market sources or analysis.
Balanced presentation
Benefits, risks, uncertainty, jurisdictional differences, limitations and credible alternative interpretations remain visible.
Authorship
Substantive pages identify the author or research lead and link to the relevant profile.
Review labels
Only accurate labels may be used, including Not medically reviewed, Research reviewed or Reviewed for source accuracy.
AI-assisted production
Human responsibility remains mandatory
Permitted support
AI tools may assist with research organization, drafting, comparison, formatting, editing or quality checks.
Required verification
Sources, citations, quotations, medical language, regulatory claims and the final page must be checked and approved by the responsible human author or editor.
Commercial separation
Sponsorship must not become editorial control
Affiliate links, sponsorships, paid placements and material commercial relationships must be disclosed clearly. Sponsored content must not be presented as independent editorial analysis.
Prohibited editorial practices
- Fabricated sources, statistics or testimonials
- Implied medical review that did not occur
- Unsupported guarantees or personal predictions
- Preliminary evidence presented as settled fact
- Company marketing claims presented as independent evidence
- Commercial relationships concealed from readers